The real question of consciousness is resolving the "higher level" processing with the neural architecture we possess. I am therefore informed by complex dynamics theory; the complexity of the neurology is sufficient to give rise to computational capability in excess of that which is implied by a linear or quasi-linear analysis of the potential of such a collection of simple processing units. I am yet to discover where the "lower limit" of complexity lies and the concommitant consciousness change - my understanding of the literature is that conjecture still rules. However, I am most encouraged by the recent developments in the resolving power of fMRI, which, by the way, may lead to the end of invasive monkey (and other animal) testing.
On that note, I suppose I believe that many, maybe most, animals have consciousness and feelings, and therefore I am opposed to animal testing.
I am hoping to learn some "practical psychology" in the course, as developmental and clinical psychology was not my area of focus, although I have had a lot of exposure to clinical training - my principal investigations were in the areas of
I am hoping to gain insight into areas like ADHD, and tips on how to
deal with "naughty (or disruptive) kids".